powerpc/64s: Include cpu header
authorBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:54:12 +0000 (11:54 -0300)
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:16:58 +0000 (23:16 +0100)
commit25b3e1e84a5a11b1cd980fd0e059c303af5a506d
tree5983e8bd2b6edc990bd2161d1a697c734db2b13b
parent4b42b9979e9da6f25ecb202f026acd542e7b8ec4
powerpc/64s: Include cpu header

Current powerpc security.c file is defining functions, as
cpu_show_meltdown(), cpu_show_spectre_v{1,2} and others, that are being
declared at linux/cpu.h header without including the header file that
contains these declarations.

This is being reported by sparse, which thinks that these functions are
static, due to the lack of declaration:

arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:105:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_meltdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:139:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v1' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:161:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v2' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:209:6: warning: symbol 'stf_barrier' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:289:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spec_store_bypass' was not declared. Should it be static?

This patch simply includes the proper header (linux/cpu.h) to match
function definition and declaration.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Gbp-Pq: Topic bugfix/all/spec
Gbp-Pq: Name powerpc-64s-include-cpu-header.patch
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c